A ghost kitchen (also called a cloud kitchen or delivery-only restaurant) is literally a restaurant with no dining room or storefront, devoted entirely to takeout and delivery orders. During the pandemic, entrepreneurs and big chains jumped on the ghost kitchen model to quickly reach online customers without investing in prime real estate.

‍

The idea was simple: run multiple virtual brands out of the same back kitchen, cut costs on waitstaff and décor, and ride booming food delivery demand. It sounded cost-effective and low-risk – no expensive brick-and-mortar or foot traffic needed. In fact, Business Insider noted, ghost kitchens were “restaurants with no storefront and no seating,” only serving delivery.

‍

But in practice, that lean business model had hidden downsides. When life returned to normal, many restaurants discovered ghost kitchens were harder to run profitably than expected. Quality slipped, order volume was unpredictable, and operational costs piled up in unexpected ways. As one expert put it, ghost kitchens became “haunted by their own anonymity”.

‍

This isn’t just industry gossip – major players have already scaled back or shut their ghost concepts after cutting losses. In this article we’ll break down the ghost kitchen phenomenon, what caused its boom, why it has fizzled, and the lessons brick-and-mortar food businesses can learn. Think of it as a guide to avoiding the same pitfalls – with some practical tips and real stories from U.S. restaurants.

‍

The Ghost Kitchen Boom: A Pandemic-Era Lifeline

When COVID-19 first forced dining rooms to close, restaurants scrambled for any way to survive. Ghost kitchens seemed like the perfect “delivery-only” solution. As The Week reported, industry insiders called them a “salvation for the restaurant industry”: a cheaper, delivery-focused business model during lockdowns.

‍

You could set up shop in any commercial kitchen, or even rent shared kitchen space, and pump out food under a new virtual brand. Since customers never saw your staff or storefront, ghost kitchen brands got to tap into delivery platforms (Uber Eats, DoorDash, Grubhub, etc.) without paying for prime location rent or full staffing. In many cases, a single kitchen might bake pizza, grill burgers, and fry wings for different brands – even dozens of menus could be sent from one building. This multi-brand approach promised higher delivery order volume and more ways to reach customers from a single space.

‍

Restaurants and investors poured money in. Big companies and celebs launched “delivery-only” concepts. For example, U.S. grocery chain Kroger partnered with a ghost kitchen startup, and Wendy’s announced plans for hundreds of delivery hubs. Chains like Chili’s rolled out virtual wing brands (“It’s Just Wings”) to sell extra revenue through apps. 

‍

Even YouTubers jumped on it (the MrBeast Burger chain launched in late 2020, using ghost kitchens). The pitch was hard to resist: test a new menu or brand without building a physical restaurant; extend your delivery radius cheaply; get more online orders without the overhead of a sit-down spot. Under normal circumstances this model could indeed be cost effective: fewer front-of-house staff, no dining room to clean, and the ability to cut ingredient costs through bulk prepping for multiple menus.

‍

Key drivers of the ghost kitchen boom included:

• Low overhead compared to traditional restaurants – no dining area, cheaper location in an industrial park, no waiters.
• Speed and flexibility – you could launch or tweak a brand quickly (even seasonally) without a long build-out.
• Multiple virtual brands – one kitchen could cook for several ghost kitchen brands at once, increasing throughput and menu items.
• Riding the delivery wave – with millions craving takeout, it felt like a near-guaranteed way to tap into busy delivery apps and reach more individual customers.
• Investor hype – venture funds and delivery service platforms (who collected heavy commissions) pushed the idea that virtual restaurants were “the next big thing” in the restaurant industry.

‍

Initially, this strategy did boost revenues for some. Restaurants quickly expanded into the delivery business even if they had no brick-and-mortar growth plans. A mid-market example: Brinker International (owner of Chili’s) opened two virtual concepts during the pandemic – a wings brand and a pasta brand – to utilize existing kitchens.

‍

Chains like Dunkin’ had local ghost brands pop up to reach people at home. The early success stories – combined with aggressive marketing by ghost-kitchen landlords (co-working “virtual food courts”) – kept interest high through 2021.

‍

Why the Trend Fizzled: Hidden Costs and Complaints

But by 2023, the bloom was off the rose. As The Week reports, once lockdowns ended and customers returned to dining rooms, things went south. Many restaurants found ghost-kitchen operations created more headaches than revenue. Here’s how the script flipped:

• Delivery saturation and demand drop. Once people could dine in again, the surge in online orders slowed. Delivery dollars got reallocated back to tables. In fact, by 2023 many big chains “found themselves squeezed by overtaxed kitchens and rising customer complaints,” and simply backed off the ghost. Wendy’s notably pulled back on its ghost-kitchen expansion, and Kroger closed all its delivery-only kitchens in 2023. As an industry analyst put it, consumers still love delivery, but now they crave a relationship with the original brand. Virtual brands lacked that human connection, so guests gravitated back to known. In short, the business model relied on a false peak of delivery demand.

‍

• Hidden fees ate profits. Ghost kitchens were sold as lower-cost but ran into layers of new costs. Legal experts point out “multiple layers of costs” in the ghost kitchen. Every order typically triggered a 20–30% commission to the delivery app, which was often tacked onto menu prices. The restaurant or virtual brand might have to pay rent or a licensing fee to the ghost-kitchen operator – sometimes higher per square foot than a traditional lease – plus even percentage rent on sales. On the consumer end, the meal often cost more than if ordered at a restaurant, since apps and kitchens were each cutting themselves in. All these extra fees left a razor-thin profit margin. As Alon Lagstein told Restaurant Dive: “When you add all of that together, there’s just not enough for everybody”. In practice, many ghost startups ran entirely on venture funding because they couldn’t make the numbers work amid inflation and high commission.

‍

• Quality-control problems. Many delivery-only menus suffered when the food had to travel. Because ghost restaurants were anonymous, customers had no loyalty buffer for a late or cold delivery. Complaints mounted: in 2023 Uber Eats even delisted about 8,000 virtual restaurants for quality issues or duplicate listings. One report cited entire chains of bad reviews for viral ghost-burger brands. The Week noted that many virtual brands “created a pretty bad perception” with diners. In short, ghost restaurants struggled to maintain food quality, because the kitchen staff weren’t interacting directly with the dining customer. Recipes that might shine in a dine-in kitchen (like pho, salads, or cold dishes) often arrived subpar after delivery. Once trust is lost, it’s very hard for a non-branded menu to win it back.

‍

• Conflict with main operations. For existing sit-down restaurants trying ghost kitchens in their own space, juggling normal service and a separate delivery menu backfired. Brinker’s CEO Kevin Hochman admitted that running “It’s Just Wings” out of Chili’s kitchens became a nightmare: “It was too much to have a busy dinner rush with an influx of virtual orders coming in, too.”. In other words, one kitchen and one team simply couldn’t handle both a full house and a flood of app orders. Many restaurateurs found their own labor and equipment were already working at capacity, so adding ghost brands on the side pulled focus (and staff) away from paying customers.

‍

• Overcrowded marketplace. Almost every city started seeing multiple ghost kitchens and dozens of virtual brands using the same kitchen space. This created confusion and regulatory headaches. Health inspectors worried about cross-contamination in busy ghost kitchens and keeping track of so many tenants. Likewise, hungry customers scrolling through delivery platforms faced dozens of nearly-identical sushi and pizza spots – often run by the same operator – making branding meaningless. The lack of a unique identity (no staff to greet, no storefront name to remember) meant many ghost restaurant concepts vanished without a trace.

‍

Summing it up: Ghost kitchens burst onto the scene as a trendy answer for delivery-only growth, but the assumptions behind the trend didn’t hold up. What looked like easy profit (no dining room, no waitstaff, multiple menus) turned out to be offset by tough realities: high delivery fees, an overload of virtual brands, quality headaches, and fickle customer demand. As Deloitte analysts noted, “the impact of ghost kitchens was overestimated,” and they’re now seeing the decline firsthand.

‍

Key Lessons for Restaurants

Whether you run a diner, bar, or fast-casual chain, these lessons from the ghost kitchen saga can help your business stay grounded and profitable:

‍

Don’t ignore total costs

Before launching a delivery-only menu or ghost brand, do the math on all fees. Remember that food delivery apps typically take up to 30% per order, and ghost-kitchen operators might charge extra rent or a share of sales. If you can’t charge higher menu prices to cover these, you may be “eating” the extra expense. As one industry attorney warned, all those fees can leave “not enough for everybody”. Bulletproof your profit margins by using tools (or even simple spreadsheets) to factor in commissions, licensing fees, and ingredient costs.

‍

Be picky with your menu

Focus on delivery-friendly dishes that travel well. Overhauling your entire menu for a ghost brand can backfire if the food doesn’t hold up. Many ghost kitchens failed because their food (steaks, salads, etc.) lost quality in transit. Instead, test a few proven hits or crowd-pleasers first. Or use technology like WISK.ai (coming up below) to analyze sales and waste data, which helps you tune new menu items before scaling them for delivery.

‍

Maintain brand connection

A virtual brand has to earn trust from day one. Unlike brick-and-mortar restaurants where regulars expect consistency and service, a virtual restaurant has only online reviews and photos to work with. Collect customer feedback aggressively: respond to app reviews, promote your story on social media, and emphasize your existing brand’s reputation. If guests can’t visit your place, they should at least recognize your name on the app. Otherwise, you risk low repeat business once novelty wears off.

‍

Balance capacity carefully

If you do run a virtual brand alongside your main restaurant, schedule carefully. Avoid launching a late-night ghost menu if your dine-in crowd peaks then. As the CEO of Chili’s noted, it became “too much” to handle virtual wing orders on top of a dinner rush. Consider dedicated shifts or staff for delivery, or invest in efficiency (like staging separate prep areas) so that online orders don’t slow down table service. And track demand: are you getting enough delivery orders at certain times to justify the added complexity?

‍

Leverage technology and data

Use inventory and analytics tools to keep costs in check. For example, WISK.ai (an AI inventory platform) can track every ingredient and sales channel in real time, so you know exactly which dishes are profitable. By analyzing orders from delivery apps alongside your supply purchases, WISK helps predict demand and reduce waste. This ensures you never overstock ingredients for a menu that flops, or run out of key items when deliveries spike. (More on WISK below!)

‍

Build multiple channels wisely

Ghost kitchens highlight the risk of relying solely on delivery platforms. Explore hybrid models: encourage in-store pickup on your own website to save commission fees, or use a mix of delivery drivers (in-house or couriers) and third-party apps. Diversifying where orders come from can smooth out fluctuations. For example, launching your own online ordering portal can give customers more brand loyalty and reduce dependency on delivery apps’ algorithms.

‍

These takeaways show that launching a delivery-only concept isn’t a guaranteed shortcut. But they also illustrate how any restaurant – ghost or traditional – can benefit from better planning. For brick-and-mortar places, the ghost kitchen “failure” mostly means: don’t treat online delivery as an afterthought. Use the lessons (and tech) to manage it rigorously.

‍

Ghost Kitchens vs. Your Real Kitchen: Bridging the Gap with WISK.ai

Ghost kitchens promised a “cut costs and scale up fast” solution, but missed one thing: smart management. Whether you run a diner or a multi-unit chain, the future of delivery lies in integration, not invisibility. This is where WISK.ai comes in. WISK is an AI-driven inventory and analytics platform built for bars and restaurants to handle exactly these challenges. Here’s how WISK helps you avoid the ghost-trap:

• Real-Time Inventory Tracking: Know exactly what’s in your commercial kitchen at any time. If you run multiple menus or ghost brands, WISK tracks ingredients per recipe and flags when stock is low. No more guessing how much cheddar you have left for those new gourmet grilled cheeses on delivery apps.

‍

• Cost Control and Forecasting: WISK calculates the true cost of every dish (even your virtual menus) and monitors profit margins. It can project how ingredient usage changes when you add a delivery-only menu or run promotions. This ensures you can price delivery items to cover all commissions and still turn a profit. No more surprise rent and delivery fees eating your bottom line!

‍

• Seamless Data Across Channels: Connect WISK to your POS and delivery platforms so you see both online orders and in-restaurant sales in one dashboard. That way, when a ghost-brand item suddenly sells out 50 times a week, WISK adjusts ordering suggestions. You get the full picture of your restaurant business online.

‍

• Waste Reduction and Efficiency: Because ghost kitchens often batch-prepare for multiple brands, controlling spoilage is key. WISK’s analytics help you identify which ingredients or dishes are underperforming. You can quickly cut or tweak menu items before they drain profits. Restaurants using WISK report wasting far less and spending less on over-ordering.

‍

• Flexibility for New Concepts: The beauty of ghost concepts was supposed to be agility. With WISK, you truly can experiment quickly – but safely. Planning a new delivery-only menu? WISK can simulate the cost and inventory impact before you launch, so you avoid expensive missteps.

‍

In short, WISK.ai equips any restaurant – ghost concept or not – to run a leaner, data-driven operation. The ghost kitchen model itself may have stumbled, but the goal of serving more customers via delivery is here to stay. WISK helps you do that without ghosts: using clear insights rather than guesswork.

‍

Ready to supercharge your kitchen and master delivery? Check out WISK.ai for a free demo. WISK’s inventory management and analytics will help you cut costs, boost profit margins, and focus on food (not headaches). Avoid the ghost kitchen pitfalls by running a smarter, more efficient restaurant – WISK can show you how.

‍